Abstract
As growing numbers of children are born to cohabiting couples, increasing attention is paid to the higher instability of these families when compared to married ones. Even if theoretical thinking about the diffusion process of cohabitation is contemporaneous to studies on couple instability, researchers have seldom tested associations between them. We argue that the instability gap between cohabiting and married families is not constant over time and place; rather, it evolves in relation to the social status cohabitation has achieved in a given society. We explore a normativity hypothesis stating that as births within cohabitation become more common and thus more socially normative, cohabiting family instability decreases. We use multilevel logistic models with a series of cross-sectional Canadian data to compare the evolution of the odds of parental disruption for children in various geolinguistic groups, taken as proxies for normative environments. We find strong support for the normativity hypothesis in the Canadian context.
confirm funding
Event ID
17
Paper presenter
55 701
Type of Submissions
Regular session presentation, if not selected I agree to present my paper as a poster
Language of Presentation
English
Initial First Choice
Weight in Programme
1 000
Status in Programme
1
Submitted by david.pelletie… on