Stable Populations: a Necessary Condition for Sustainability. The Scope for Alliances with Environmentalists and Economists
Abstract
Three important facts, dictated by the bio-physics of our finite planet, are widely ignored:
a) Total human impact on the planet equals, by definition, average impact per person multiplied by the number of people; so each additional person increases the rate of ecological degradation;
b) Natural resources per person are, by definition, total natural resources divided by the number of people; so each additional person increases the rate of resource depletion and reduces everyone else’s ‘share’;
c) Like growth in anything physical on a physically finite planet, population growth will definitely end at some point, either sooner by fewer births or later by more deaths; ie through contraception backed by policy and resources, or by the ‘natural’ controls by which every other species is kept in balance with its habitat - famine, disease and predation/war.
Environmentalists and economists across the UN and globally show no awareness of these, with potentially disastrous consequences. Examples are given; reasons including irrational taboos are analysed; underlying assumptions listed; the three disciplines compared; and a proactive role for population scientists proposed.
a) Total human impact on the planet equals, by definition, average impact per person multiplied by the number of people; so each additional person increases the rate of ecological degradation;
b) Natural resources per person are, by definition, total natural resources divided by the number of people; so each additional person increases the rate of resource depletion and reduces everyone else’s ‘share’;
c) Like growth in anything physical on a physically finite planet, population growth will definitely end at some point, either sooner by fewer births or later by more deaths; ie through contraception backed by policy and resources, or by the ‘natural’ controls by which every other species is kept in balance with its habitat - famine, disease and predation/war.
Environmentalists and economists across the UN and globally show no awareness of these, with potentially disastrous consequences. Examples are given; reasons including irrational taboos are analysed; underlying assumptions listed; the three disciplines compared; and a proactive role for population scientists proposed.
confirm funding
Event ID
17
Paper presenter
53 740
Type of Submissions
Regular session only
Language of Presentation
English
First Choice History
Initial First Choice
Initial Second Choice
Weight in Programme
1 000
Status in Programme
1